On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 00:08, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
PS. I don't know whether the "EDT" in Hoffman's article's timestamp reflects the 
MS-Windows 10 bug or is a subtle joke; it could be both.

Based on what I can tell, neither.  It's currently 10:30 EST, and this article is listed from the homepage with a relative timestamp of "6m ago", but the timestamp given on the page itself reads "10:24 EDT".  It seems "EDT" has been used for all articles there since the time change, at least.

--
Tim Parenti