On 2019-01-24 11:30, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 1/24/19 2:05 AM, Joachim Damm wrote:
>> we found one issue in the Oracle database that DST calculation is wrong from
>> 2040 and beyond.
>
> Which DST calculation, exactly, and what are the incorrect and correct values?
>
> Perhaps you're thinking about Brazil, Iran, or Morocco. In these countries DST
> rules are so complex that they cannot be expressed in closed form in the tzdb
> notation, so tzdb lists rules explicitly for each year. Eventually this list has
> to stop, though, as the database and its maintainers' patience are finite. For
> Brazil and Morocco the list of exact predictions stops after 2037; for Iran, 2087.
>
> Brazil and Morocco keep changing their DST rules, so any prediction past this
> year (much less past 2037) is dubious anyway. In contrast, Iran's rules have
> been stable since 2008, so I extended its exact prediction to 2087; there is
> some technical confusion about how to interpret Iran's rules after that, and
> even Iran is likely to change its rules before 2087.
>
> If there's a real need to predict past 2037, what is the need and how far does
> it really go?

Looks like tzdb supported 64 bit time_t from [19]95f, with updates in 2004h and
 2006b, when support for 64 bit tzdata was added.
Oracle is old so may only support 32 bit tzdata up to 2038 for compatibility: as
with Java tzdb issues, they are due to Oracle design choices.

--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.