Please remove me from the mailing list.
Too much email concerning this issue. I would suggest meeting
in a common virtual space and having a live discussion, rather then "replying
all" when continuing to have this conversation.
Thank You,
Terrence Barrett
From:
David Magda <dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca>
To:
<tz@lecserver.nci.nih.gov>
Cc:
Paul Koning <paul_koning@Dell.com>,
Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu>
Date:
07/01/2011 01:29 PM
Subject:
Re: TAI zone?
On Jul 1, 2011, at 13:21, Paul Koning wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
>> If you care *that* much, you need something fancier, e.g. an atomic
clock. :-) I seem to remember some news article in the past year
or so indicating that there might be some new type of atomic clock coming
out that would be less expensive, but I can't seem to find it with some
simple Googling.
>
> There was a new clock that's particularly compact (an inch or so max
dimension). It wasn't clear just how it works, but it sounded like
it's comparable in stability to a rubidium clock.
>
> In the meantime, I think the cheapest atomic time source is a GPS
box.
Probably related to this:
> Now an atomic clock-on-a-chip is available that is the result of 10
years of government-funded research and development. The chip is not cheap
— $1,500 — but it costs less than conventional atomic clocks and the
price is sure to go down as manufacturing gears up to meet demand from
military applications.
http://science.slashdot.org/story/11/05/11/1745213/
------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are
hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination,
distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon
this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
------------------------------------------------------------