On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 4:45 PM Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
+However, the leap second support of this package is rarely used directly
+because POSIX requires leap seconds to be ignored

For what it's worth, I never like the term "ignored" in this context.  For example, I might claim that POSIX requires leap seconds to be taken into account (in order to remove them from the "seconds-since-the-epoch" count), and that it is the "right" clock that ignores them.  Conversely, others might say leap seconds are ignored in the POSIX absolute<->civil conversions, and taken into account in the "right" conversions.  So, "ignored" doesn't really apply to either system ... they both deal with leap seconds in some fashion.