March 10, 2020
8:45 p.m.
As far as I can tell, those regions have expressed desire to join Russia but they have been rejected by Russia, so it doesn't make sense to mention Russia when talking about them. 在 2020年3月11日週三 04:35,Brian Inglis <Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca> 寫道: > On 2020-03-07 08:22, Paul Eggert wrote: > > On 3/6/20 3:44 PM, bebyx via tz wrote: > >> Default timezone names for Ukraine, e.g. Europe/Kiev, are more > understandable > >> and correct than ridiculous fantasy style, e.g. Ruthenia. > > > > We can't simply blank the "comments" column, because the user interface > for > > tzselect currently looks like the interaction quoted at the end of this > email, > > and if the last four lines say simply "1) 2) 3) 4)" the user won't know > what to > > select. Presumably there would be similar problems with fancier user > interfaces > > employing this data. > > > > The "(most areas)" comment in Ukraine is similar to comments used in > Australia, > > Canada, and other countries. Perhaps you can suggest better comments > identifying > > the three smaller regions involved. Comments should be in the English > language > > and aimed at an English-language audience. > > Looking at the area names used in news articles and Wikipedia, the > suggestions > below seem to be used most (the region is more consistently called Luhansk > using > the Ukrainian transliteration, while the city is as often called by the > Russian > transliteration Lugansk - more political fodder): > > > $ tzselect > > Please identify a location so that time zone rules can be set correctly. > > Please select a continent, ocean, "coord", or "TZ". > > > 7) Europe > > > #? 7 > > Please select a country whose clocks agree with yours. > > > 15) France 32) Montenegro 49) Ukraine > > > #? 49 > > Please select one of the following time zone regions. > > 1) MSK+00 - Crimea > > 2) Ukraine (most areas) > 3) Zakarpatska (Transcarpathia) > 4) Zaporozhye, Luhansk (East) > > Because of regional alliances, I wonder that Donetsk did not participate > in 4. > The region appears also to be called Zaporizjzja internationally. > > According to https://tass.com/world/756540 the Donbass (Donets Basin) > region > (largest city Donetsk): Donetsk People's Republic (DPR/DNR - SE Donetsk > region - > largest city Donetsk https://www.geonames.org/709717/donetsk.html N > 48°01′23″ E > 37°48′08″) and Lu[gh]ansk People's Republic (LPR/LNR - S Luhansk region - > largest city Lu[gh]ansk https://www.geonames.org/709717/luhansk.html N > 48°34′01″ > E 39°19′01″) switched to Moscow time on 2014 October 26 like other Russian > zones. > > Western news sources report Ukraine admitted no control over those regions > since > mid-2014, and those regions have not participated in Ukrainian elections > > https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/05/01/is-this-new-era-ukrainian-politics/ > > Due to conflict, lack of stable government, and migrations, population > numbers > are likely different, and probably down, from the latest 2008 statistics > available in that region: > http://www.geonames.org/UA/largest-cities-in-ukraine.html > > You may want to consider adding zones for those regions considering their > history e.g. > [RU,]UA +4801+03748 Europe/Donetsk MSK+00 - DPR > [RU,]UA +4834+03919 Europe/Luhansk MSK+00 - LPR > > with histories based on Kiev and Zaporozhye, recently updated like > Simferopol: > > Zone Europe/Donetsk 2:02:04 - LMT 1880 > 2:02:04 - KMT 1924 May 2 # Kiev Mean > Time > 2:00 - EET 1930 Jun 21 > 3:00 - MSK 1941 Sep 20 > 1:00 C-Eur CE%sT 1943 Nov 6 > 3:00 Russia MSK/MSD 1990 Jul 1 2:00 > 2:00 1:00 EEST 1991 Sep 29 3:00 > 2:00 E-Eur EE%sT 1995 > 2:00 EU EE%sT 2014 Oct 26 2:00s > 3:00 - MSK > > Zone Europe/Luhansk 2:20:40 - LMT 1880 > 2:20 - +0220 1924 May 2 > 2:00 - EET 1930 Jun 21 > 3:00 - MSK 1941 Aug 25 > 1:00 C-Eur CE%sT 1943 Oct 25 > 3:00 Russia MSK/MSD 1991 Mar 31 2:00 > 2:00 E-Eur EE%sT 1995 > 2:00 EU EE%sT 2014 Oct 26 2:00s > 3:00 - MSK > > -- > Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada > > This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains > too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. >