Even so that would likely be easier to disambiguate from context than Minsk/Moscow.

On Apr 3, 2015 9:31 PM, "Arthur David Olson" <arthurdavidolson@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me, unless there's a compelling reason to use something other than MINT; I haven't heard any that I consider compelling.

We're okay with MINT for Minsk Time as long as North Dakota doesn't adopt a unique scheme.-)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_in_North_Dakota#Cities

        @dashdashado

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

On Apr 3, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Dzmitry Kazimirchyk <dkazimirchyk@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 04/04/2015 02:32 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>> But if you don't want them downplayed, please suggest an abbreviation to use for Minsk time.
>
> Since there is no official or habitual abbreviation in use as I've mentioned before, I assume it will be right to use the standard approach mentioned in this discussion previously which suggested either MINT or BYT. I assume MINT is more correct abbreviation for "Minsk time", so I personally would pick this one.

+1 from me, unless there's a compelling reason to use something other than MINT; I haven't heard any that I consider compelling.