On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Tobias Conradi
<mail.2012@tobiasconradi.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Kevin Lyda <kevin@ie.suberic.net> wrote:

>> Shouldn't it be Asia/تل أبيب?

> Not according to:
> ftp://ftp.iana.org/tz/code/Theory
> Use only valid POSIX file name components (i.e., the parts of
> names other than `/'). Within a file name component,
> use only ASCII letters, `.', `-' and `_'.

And you just accept that? Why shouldn't the Arabic name be used - is
this further European injustice against the peaceful Palestinian
people?
>> I don't think we should make any change.
> Why that?

Why did you partially quote me and then ask me a question that the
part you deleted answered. My full sentence was, "Until the name can
be expressed properly in the local language, I don't think we should
make any change."
Is this because you realise that I have exposed your pro-Israel bias?

It doesn't matter if it's serious or tongue-in-cheek, it's not useful at all.

Yes, beyond just inconsiderations that start all the way back with ARPANET, ANSI and other legacy details, we all live in the "real world." And yes, we can all also debate the history, issues, injustices, etc... of the world, and make many, many subjective arguments in many directions. But despite how little or much we do, all in the name of awareness and understanding, all we're going to do is end up with the exact same, technical issues.

For the most part, the overwhelming majority of people here are not insensitive, but also do not have an agenda other than a technical one, because, simply, it's as objective as we can be, even if imperfect, even if not everyone has the same experiences, even if not everyone is aware of every detail. Just try to remain focused on the technical issues and try to come up with solutions that are as considerate as possible while still feasible given how the project has always operated, for impartiality as best as it can.

-- bjs