Thanks, Chris. I look forward to Mark Segal's update in due course.

The other thing about the matrix that needs editing is to include when (time period) the different solutions were/are tested because as we all know providers update their solutions from time to time, so our records could well be outdated (as Tracy alluded to). 

Justine 
-----


On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 00:18, Chris Gift <chris.gift@icann.org> wrote:

Hi everyone,

 

I believe we’re looking at a two-pronged approach to solving this problem. For our public meetings we have very specific room requirements to support translation and transcription and other unique features. For these meetings we will continue to use Adobe Connect as nothing else really meets all of our must-haves. It’s imperfect and we struggle at times, but it’s hands down the best on the market for our needs.

 

However, for smaller meetings, conference calls, working groups, secure meetings, etc., I believe we would like to begin using Zoom. I don’t know if the decision is final and perhaps Mark Segal can chime in when he’s back from holiday.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Chris Gift

 

From: ttf <ttf-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Justine Chew <justine.chew@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:50 PM
To: Technology Taskforce WG <ttf@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [technology taskforce] Webconferencing tools matrix - requires update

 

Yes, I too heard Ashwin Rangan say that ICANN was testing another platform and yes, he would not say which one. Also I recall some time ago of ICANN IT referring to the web-conferencing features wish-list presented in our ICANN60 TTF report as helpful (and Judith can probably say more on this than I can). 

In addition, Don Hollander of the UASG reminded me at ICANN63 that we ought to include UA/EAI compliance as a desirable criteria -- I thought this was useful feedback and have inserted this into the matrix.

ps. Olivier - Slack as a potential replacement for Adobe Connect, really? Hmm.


Regards,

Justine 
-----

 

On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 09:19, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:

In Barcelona, ICANN said they were testing another platform to augment Adobe Connect. They implied it should be deployex soon, but would not say what product it was.
--
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.

On November 1, 2018 8:50:14 PM EDT, "Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond" <ocl@gih.com> wrote:

Dear Sarah,

in the recent "Adobe Connect scare", ICANN stopped using Adobe Connect for over a month and I guess this provided us with the ability to test other systems, not just as a test, but in a production environment. It turned out that the two systems that were used as an emergency back-up were ill-suited for the job as they missed several features that Adobe Connect has.
Webex came out worse. It seems that as soon as you use it with documents, chat, and several people on the call, the thing just doesn't work well and ends up frustrating everyone to end up hating it. Zoom came out okay but is missing several features, if only the ability to see all of the hands up in the correct order, and by someone else than the host.

In the past we also tested Slack as a potential replacement for Adobe Connect, when ICANN was looking at alternatives. Again, that had many limitations which made our life harder in a production environment.

Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 01/11/2018 22:57, Sarah Kiden wrote:

Hi Glenn,

 

I am guessing this is for comparison purposes. During the first public forum at the just concluded meeting in Barcelona, a participant asked if ICANN was looking at alternatives for AdobeConnect. I believe looking at them can help us see what features to request for in AdobeConnect if we find something exciting.

 

Kind regards,


Sarah

 

 

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:07 PM Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi 

I wonder why we are spending time on alternatives?  


Glenn McKnight

NARALO Secretariat
mcknight.glenn@gmail.com

IEEE Toronto SIGHT Chair 

glenn.mcknight@ieee.org
skype  gmcknight
twitter gmcknight

289-830 6259
.

 

 

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:05 PM Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:

As a FYI,

Atlassian sells Jitsi, an open-source videoconferencing tool it acquired in 2015, to 8×8

 

Shouldn't be any changes to Jitsi. Also another new feature to Jitsi is geographical bridge cascading.

 

Dev Anand

_______________________________________________
ttf mailing list
ttf@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ttf

_______________________________________________
ttf mailing list
ttf@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ttf



_______________________________________________
ttf mailing list
ttf@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ttf



-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html [gih.com]

_______________________________________________
ttf mailing list
ttf@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ttf

_______________________________________________
ttf mailing list
ttf@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ttf