On 01/07/2014 15:58, Garth Bruen wrote:
First,
remote participation is not anywhere near the level it should
be. Our members even in the U.S complain about the quality and
accessibility. Then there is the whole issue of disabled access
which is a disgrace. If remote participation was truly
effective, few people would even have to attend the meetings in
person. There were many proposals and discussions around
improving remote participation, some extracted from the
Netmundial meeting. I have been discussing a better type of
overall participation with some of my colleagues in At-Large and
hope to have a draft for leadership to review soon.
What could be done at improving remote participation?
Our meetings now have full video and are much more interactive than
they used to be. What else should we do to improve the experience?
Kind regards,
Olivier