On Tue, 7 Apr 2026 at 18:49, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:

On 07/04/2026 08:00, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:

A comment can be added simply. or something similar.

"We recognise that the proposed Transition Article is intended as a necessary and temporary measure to address current challenges in the review system, and agree that it should remain clearly framed as a temporary and purpose-driven measure. "

I do not think the proposed Transition Article is "necessary". I see it more as a post-event fudge to try to ease the fact that at present ICANN is not following its Bylaws.
Kindest regards,

Then its a different topic :) I am comfortable in framing it as a "pragmatic (if not necessary) and temporary measure", even if views may differ on whether it is strictly “necessary.”

Olivier