Las decisiones de la Corte Penal Internacional en relaci�n con las objeciones de la comunidad de ALAC contra solicitantes "Ganso Fest, LLC" y "punto de salud limitada" a la cadena de SALUD.
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Las decisiones de la Corte Penal Internacional en relación con las objeciones de la comunidad de ALAC contra solicitantes "Ganso Fest, LLC" y "punto de salud limitada" a la cadena de SALUD. De: devtee@gmail.com Queridos todos, Justo antes del 13 de marzo de 2013, el ALAC presentó objeciones contra la comunidad solicitantes "DotHealth, LLC", "Ganso Fest, LLC" y "punto Health Limited" para la cadena SALUD.. La presentación de las objeciones fue la culminación del proceso por el cual ALAC puede presentar objeciones a una nueva solicitud de gTLD ( https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/31178691/alac-facts-objecti... ). El Grupo de Revisión de gTLD ( https://community.icann.org/x/u7-bAQ) el proceso de objeción dentro de At-Large. El nuevo Dashboard de gTLD en http://bit.ly/newgtld tiene el archivo de la los comentarios recibidos por el Grupo de Revisión de gTLD, las declaraciones de objeción considerado por el RALO y ALAC y un registro de los consejos RALO y la Consideración del ALAC de los consejos de la RALO. Un Objeciones ALAC Seguimiento Grupo, presidido por Seth Reiss fue creado por ALAC para seguir con el proceso de objeción ya que estaba siendo escuchado por la CPI. Desde marzo de 2013, - Uno de los solicitantes "punto Health Limited" retiraron su solicitud de . LA SALUD; - Los solicitantes presentaron una respuesta a las declaraciones de objeción con la CPI (Ccing las objeciones ALAC Seguimiento del Grupo) - La audiencia de los 2 objeciones se consolidó a ser oído por un panelista (con la aprobación de los solicitantes y las objeciones del ALAC Followup grupo). - El panelista elegido por la Corte Penal Internacional fue profesor Jan Paulsson. - La panelista no pidió ni los solicitantes o el Grupo de Seguimiento ALAC para cualquier comunicación de seguimiento. El 16 de enero de 2013, el miembro del jurado de la CPI rechazó las objeciones contra ALAC las dos aplicaciones. Las resoluciones se adjuntan a este mensaje, pero puede ser consultar en http://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/drsp/17jan14/determination-1-1... http://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/drsp/17jan14/determination-1-1... Un correo electrónico por Seth Reiss fue publicada en la lista de correo ALAC_announce y es adjunta a continuación. A modo de referencia, todas las determinaciones de los cargos »se pueden ver en http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/odr/determination De la nota, - El Objetor Independiente (IO) presentó objeciones de la comunidad para las aplicaciones a. MED y prevaleció - La IO presentó objeción de la comunidad a la solicitud de MEDICA y prevaleció. - La IO presentó objeciones Interés Público Limitado a las solicitudes de . SALUD que fueron despedidos (los solicitantes prevaleció). - La IO presentó objeciones de la comunidad y Limited interés público . Asistencia sanitaria y fueron despedidos (los solicitantes prevalecieron). De nuevo, vea http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/odr/determination para los enlaces a estas determinaciones. Saludos cordiales, Dev Anand Teelucksingh On Mon, 20 de enero 2014 a las 17:30, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> escribió:
Forwarded email from Seth Reiss:
ALAC Members:
On 16 January, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) issued two decisions authored by ICC panelist Professor Jan Paulsson finding against the objections that had been lodged by the ALAC pursuant Attachment to Module 3 of Applicant's Guidebook. The ALAC had submitted three objections under the Community Objection ground outlined in Module 3, each against an applicant for the .health string, based in substantial part upon concerns voiced and information received from the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA). In the case of one applicant, dot Health Limited, the applicant withdrew its application prior to the case being decided leaving only two ALAC objections to be decided. The remaining two cases were consolidated and decisions issued 16 January 2014. Copies of those decisions are attached.
Professor Paulsson found against ALAC on the issue of standing, as well as on each of the four criteria, set forth in Subsection 3.5.4 of the Guidebook, required to sustain an objection on community grounds. The decisions, which are substantially identical (perhaps appropriate for consolidated cases) are full of opinions and innuendo, that makes for good reading but leaves one to wonder how the ALAC could have lodged objections that had any chance of succeeding, which in turns begs the question of the Guidebook's purpose in authorizing and funding the ALAC to lodge objections in the first place. One commentator,
http://domainnamewire.com/2014/01/17/health-applicants-survive-community-obj... , suggests that having a geographically diverse three person panel might have given rise to a more satisfying result.
Irrespective of the merits, the procedure in this case was less than transparent and did not achieve the efficiency the Guidebook had intended. Some communications did not reach the ALAC in a timely manner due to misunderstandings on email protocols, the Center continued applicant response deadlines for various reasons and, most striking, there was a four month delay between Professor's submission of his draft opinion to the ICC and the ICC's release of the same. The procedures found in the Guidebook set forth strict turnaround times. In the case of the decision, there was supposed to have been a 45 day turnaround between the constitution of the panel and issuance of the decision. Article 21 (a) of the Procedure, Attachment to Module 3, Applicant's Guidebook. In this case, the panel was constituted on 11 July but the decision was dated 13 January 2014 and released three days later. The substantial delay suggests insensitivity on the part of the ICC to the Guidebook's goal of have swift and efficient dispute resolution considering that it took four months to "scrutinize" a decision that only took a bit more than one month to prepare, and considering that the scrutiny process is primarily intended to address matters of form rather than substance.
On a more constructive note, the ICC issued evaluation forms with its determinations, a copy of which is also attached. It would seem appropriate that the LAC complete and return the forms, perhaps through your Objections Follow Up Review Team, but with input from the ALAC and its constituents. Please let us know how you would prefer that your review team handle input for the evaluation forms.
Set forth below is a summary of the status of all the objections filed against the .health string, by the ALAC as well as by others.
Seth Reiss
Objections Follow Up Review Team Chair
HEALTH
1-1178-3236
dot Health Limited
Prof. Alain Pellet, Independent Objector
Limited Public Interest
Application Withdrawn
--
--
HEALTH
1-1178-3236
dot Health Limited
ICANN At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
Community
Application Withdrawn
--
--
HEALTH
1-1489-82287
Goose Fest, LLC
Prof. Alain Pellet, Independent Objector
Limited Public Interest
Applicant Prevailed < http://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/drsp/23dec13/determination-2-1...
16 December 2013
23 December 2013
HEALTH
1-1489-82287
Goose Fest, LLC
ICANN At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
Community
Applicant Prevailed < http://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/drsp/17jan14/determination-1-1...
13 January 2014
17 January 2014
HEALTH
1-1684-6394
DotHealth, LLC
Prof. Alain Pellet, Independent Objector
Limited Public Interest
Applicant Prevailed < http://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/drsp/23dec13/determination-2-1...
16 December 2013
23 December 2013
HEALTH
1-1684-6394
DotHealth, LLC
ICANN At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
Community
Applicant Prevailed < http://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/drsp/17jan14/determination-1-1...
13 January 2014
17 January 2014
HEALTH
1-868-3442
Afilias Limited
Prof. Alain Pellet, Independent Objector
Limited Public Interest
Applicant Prevailed < http://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/drsp/15nov13/determination-1-1...
6 November 2013
15 November 2013
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/030ee69a4e.html --]]
participants (1)
-
devtee＠gmail.com