Re: Pol�mica por votaci�n icann Propuesto
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Polémica por votación icann Propuesto Desde: apisan@unam.mx Cintra, hay una solución a largo, difícil y una corta. El corto es de indicar su opinión sobre los estatutos propuestos cambios a la consideración de asesoramiento del GAC. Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Qumica UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 México DF México + 52-1-5541444475 DESDE EL EXTRANJERO +525541444475 DESDE Mxico SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al Grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Unete a ISOC México, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ Desde: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] en Nombre de Cintra Sooknanan [cintra.sooknanan@gmail.com] Enviado de el: jueves, 21 de agosto de 2014 16:01 Hasta: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Asunto: Re: Controversia [lac-discuss-es] sobre la votación icann Propuesto La traducción Inglés de este hilo tiene muy poco sentido. Lo sentimos, pero debido a esto no puedo contribuir en este importante tema. Saludos Cintra Sooknanan El Jue, 21 de agosto 2014 a las 4:32 pm, <asoto@ibero-americano.org> escribió:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: Controversy over Proposed icann voting From: asoto@ibero-americano.org
Ftima barbarian, this type of discussion always approached us a good position. I just need you to clarify my argument to mean.
Thank you
Alberto
From: Fatima Cambronero [mailto: fatimacambronero@gmail.com] Posted on: Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:22 pm To: Alberto Soto CC: Alejandro Pisanty; HUMBERTO CARRASCO; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Controversy over Proposed icann voting
Alberto forgiveness, I do not agree at all that argument. And I'll put a good graphic example to be understood: because there murdering people then there deberamos usually have laws that punish murder?
Forgiveness for errors and brevity, I'm on the street.
Fatima
Aug 21, 2014 4:17 PM, "Alberto Soto" <asoto@ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org> > I wrote:
Another comment ms. In other internal lists or workgroups within ICANN, I'm sensing that they dont change or not, that are seldom happen that a rejection that is not of major importance, etc, etc. I think besides who participate in various forums, deberamos forward and discuss whether in our opinion the same is necessary ..... Best Regards
Alberto Soto
----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] On Behalf Of Alberto Soto Posted on: Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:44 pm To: 'Humberto Carrasco'; 'Alejandro Pisanty' CC: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Controversy over Proposed icann voting
The comment period closes on 09/14/2014 at 2300UTC. I think in addition to wait for our document, all should go read it we send yan search on your own. Arguments can invoke perhaps are not in the document, but to be themselves or others. We should note that as I said several times, representatives of end users are us, not governments involved in the GAC. Many governments generate appropriate policies for end users, but not always ... Best Regards
Alberto Soto
----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] On Behalf Of Humberto Carrasco Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:22 pm To: Alejandro Pisanty CC: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Controversy over Proposed icann voting
Dear Alejandro,
I am writing the proposal declaracinyan not trmino.
Just finished and opened to the public comments.
It will be soon.
Greetings
Sent from my iPhone
El 21-08-2014, a las 19:17, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com I wrote:
Humberto,
por algo insistimos en que organices la discusión y la emisión de un
Hasta ahora has recibido solamente expresiones en contra del cambio de
Nadie, ni siquiera nuestros representantes ante ALAC, ha expresado interview.
Hemos hecho alusión a quienes, en LACRALO, han acudido a gobiernos para manifest?
¿El debate ha terminado?
Alejandro Pisanty
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Humberto Carrasco Hi all,
To see the relevance of the subject to which it refiriVanda.
Http://www.itworldcanada.com/post/controversy >>-over-proposed-icann-vot Ing >>
Greetings >>
_______________________________________________ >> Lac-discuss->>'s mailing list Lac-discuss->> es@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
Http://www.lacralo.org >>
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/04c54d6036.html --]]
participants (1)
-
apisan@unam.mx