[[-- Translated text (en -> es) --]] Hola Dr. Pisanty Gracias por tus comentarios. Espero comentarios como usted ha sugerido. Cualquier comentario recibido será incorporado y circulado, antes de que el documento sea enviado hacia adelante. Saludos El lun 5 jun 2023 a las 11:07 Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch<apisan@unam.mx> escribió:

Claire,

no, no, no, this should be pretty clear. You sent out a draft for comments, got comments. Now it is incumbent on the drafting team to absorb all comments and send a new draft, with at least 24 hours advance to the deadline of June 7. This is a basic process issue which should merit no further discussion. If you as Secretary are not involved the only step left is to pass it on to those who were, and follow up requiring a new version on time and circulating it.

It is not only my observations that need to be absorbed. The statement that the plan may be overly ambitious should also generate a cycle of review, so that the drafters can wirte what the goals are, what happens if not all are met, so also if not all resources (people, money, availability of timeslots for meetings, admission into meetings, etc.) come together, the community knows what the fallback plan is. This is basic planning and again I don't see why it would merit further discussion.

Alejandro Pisanty

------------------------------ *De:* Claire C. Craig <claireccraig@gmail.com> *Enviado:* lunes, 5 de junio de 2023 05:46 a. m. *Para:* Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch *CC:* LAC-Discuss-en; Rodrigo de la Parra; Rodrigo Saucedo Linares *Asunto:* Re: [lac-discuss-en] LAC Strategy for Outreach and Engagement

Dear Dr. Pisanty Thanks for those observations. Your feedback is duly noted and well articulated.

As such, please fill in the gaps in the document as you identified or send me your contribution to the important LACRALO Strategy with the appropriate language based on your feedback as soon as possible, so that the document can be updated and recirculated.

Thanks for taking the time to review, and I look forward to receiving your valuable and timely input.

CCC

On 4 Jun 2023, at 11:17 PM, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch <apisan@unam.mx> wrote:



Hi,

some observations:

1. The plan as presented is not framed within either LACRALO's Strategic Plan for the same period nor (at least not explicitly) to any other ICANN plans, whether At Large or ICANN-org. This should be remedied ASAP for a second round of comments. 2. There are no quantitative, measurable goals (remember the acronym SMART); this should be remedied by the drafting party. 3. The plan does not clearly link actions to the "Policy First" Agenda agreed in the General Assembly of 2023 as well as in the process of 2014-2016. Every action by LACRALO has to be explained, measured, and assessed according to its clear causal linkage to policy production in formal PDPs. Which leads to the next: 4. There is no clear Theory of Change between the proposed actions and their effects for the above mentioned. 5. One goal that must be included is a quantitative goal of bringing in new organizations as ALSs. There is a perverse incentive for each country's presently existing ALS to avoid recruiting new organizations as ALS, as this would divide the weight of their votes by half. It will be argued that this is particularly difficult to achieve in countries with small populations, to the disadvantage of those with a rich, thriving technical and social community around the Internet; still the goal must be to add at least one ALS per country in the following 12 months. 6. There is no measure of transparency and accountability for the participants, as to actually taking up the activity agreed, assessing its quality, relevance, and impact with the intended audience, and feedback from said audience. This reinforces the impression that LACRALO refuses any measure of accountability. So be it as long as it is thought that LACRALO is an isolated entity. However, this reflects badly on the perception of the At-Large in general, and of ICANN in a broader sense, and even more impactfully, on the multistakeholder processes in general. In the year that the GDC and related UN SG and AG processes are being launced LACRALO would be doing a great disservice to the Internet governance community by not being scrupulously disciplined in this respect. So, the plan must include such measures as well in the next draft to be circulated with time enough for comments before the June 7 deadline.

Alejandro Pisanty

------------------------------ *De:* lac-discuss-en <lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> en nombre de Claire Craig <claireccraig@gmail.com> *Enviado:* viernes, 2 de junio de 2023 11:31 a. m. *Para:* LAC-Discuss-en; Rodrigo de la Parra; Rodrigo Saucedo Linares *Asunto:* [lac-discuss-en] LAC Strategy for Outreach and Engagement

Dear All Please see attached the LACRALO Outreach and Engagement Plan which was discussed at the last LACRALO Monthly Call.

Please provide your comments by Wednesday 7 June, 2023 so that it can be approved for FY 24. If not comments are received, the plan would be considered as final and forwarded to the ICANN org staff,

I look forward to your feedback as soon as possible.

Claire C. Craig LACRALO Secretariat