[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: nominación LACRALO renuncia como representante de ALAC De: carlton.samuels@gmail.com Querido Fátima: Me siento muy triste por la decisión que ha tomado, pero entiendo totalmente y empatizar con el camino que llevó a la decisión. Sepa que usted siguen aumentando en mi opinión como colega y como participante de el tipo de LACRALO yo imaginada cuando llegué a esto en 2006. Mis mejores deseos. - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= El Miércoles, 22 de agosto 2012 a las 10:17 PM, <fatimacambronero@gmail.com> escribió:

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

Subject: Waiver LACRALO nomination as representative to ALAC From: fatimacambronero@gmail.com

Dear members of LACRALO,

I am communicating with you in view of the last events occurred in our RALO to inform the decision that I have taken.

SABRN As delegates of ALS have received their credentials for vote and make a decision as a region. We must rule on whether the cuestin candidate meets the requirement of Rule 8 of our Operating Principles, specifically requiring the principal residence in one of the countries of the region.

According to the view favored our list sent by discusin LACRALO President and According the many arguments jurdicos presented in this post, basndonos in our Operating Principles LACRALO in the ICANN Bylaws, the laws of the State of California (and reinforced with additional sharee'ah), is my understanding that the rules are clear, both in terms of requiring residence in one of our countries of the region, and in addition on qutbNL> is meant by the concept residence, a separate and distinct concept the concept of domicile.

I am convinced that the rules estn to accomplish. And msan when, with jurdicos the number of arguments presented, the rules are clear.

Vote in this case implies that if we all agree (or the majority), we will decide what specifically requests violate one of our rules LACRALO.

Taking the work of analyzing and respect our rules and present presentnuestro arguments LACRALO President, is a task very few were taken and that many of the answers to that email were full of disrespect and unsubstantiated opinions, with no jurdicos arguments, which is what should be analyzed in this case.

I would like to fully understand this: I will always defend the right to region to rule and decide how issues that affect us as such. I worked and I will continue to reach consensus on our region, as it is not possible to decide for most of us. That s, subject to compliance with our operating principles, our MoU with ICANN and the ICANN Bylaws.

In the situation we are living in LACRALO, this is not the case.

We are voting to decide to break the rules.

As you all know my formation is a lawyer, and I made a vow: respect and enforce the laws (rules, rules, regulations).

Therefore, to remain part of this election process, when going against my profession, my oath and my principles, is to go against my essence.

As I have indicated those who were part of the redaccin our Operating Principles, the residence requirement (such as nationality of representatives) is by demanding our Principles Operating RALO to prevent capture by one organizacino by a group of organizations. Unfortunately it was achieved.

A RALO estcapturado not, working in a healthy harmony, is a RALO where delegates from organizations that are offered for groups Work, then participate in its conference and decisions taken by the Working Group, which is the official RALO Assembly General undertook to deliver his report to the AG, then delivers without being asked by anyone, is a RALO where officers respect the tasks and functions assigned, consultndolo Officials with the others previously, is a RALO where our representatives discussed Policies, we as members are going delivering, after they are discussed as a region.

It is regrettable that in our RALO, when you can not destroy positions with arguments, are destroyed by the force of the faults of respect, private pressures of unsubstantiated opinions.

Lords, donkey can work or get results. We are like a bucket full of crabs where to want and stick his head up ms high head stepped on each other and in the end nobody leaves that bucket.

This is not the LACRALO that I imagin.

For the reasons expressed, primarily on the grounds that estn this case violated express and clear rules requiring LACRALO our Operating Principles, * I decided to quit my LACRALO nomination as representative to ALAC. *

Also take the opportunity to inform and notify my silence and lack of activity in the next few das, because I will be subjected to quirrgica intervencin I will keep off.

Best regards,

Fatima Cambronero

- * Fatima Cambronero * Attorney-Argentina

Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @ facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero

* Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: * https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

* Join the discussions Diplo Internet Governance Community: * http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/

* Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): * http://www.internetsociety.org/ _______________________________________________

[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/00f30d9fd1.html --]]