[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: ANUNCIO VOTO: LACRALO Votación sobre Moción Propuesta de Alejandro Pisanty / Voto de LACRALO Sobre la moción Propuesta por Alejandro Pisanty De: jam@jacquelinemorris.com Estoy confundido. Lo que "potencia excepcional"? De toda nuestra documentación y normas, el único poder es el GA, que es la lista cuando estamos virtual o los miembros de la sala cuando son f2f. Estos términos son bastante aterrador para mí, ya que parece que hay situaciones en las que la constitución de la LACRALO puede ser anulado o dejar a un lado por un grupo sin la aportación de todos los miembros. Espero que esto no es así. Jacqueline Morris Jacqueline A. Morris La tecnología debe ser como el oxígeno: Ubicuo, necesario, invisible y Gratis. (Después de que Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) El Miércoles, 29 de julio 2015 a las 8:24 AM, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> escribió:

Dear Dev,

Your quotation is right. However, the same rule says, "As a general rule", which means that there is an exception. It is true that we did not wait 2 weeks. The reason is because Alejandro Pisanty proposed this resolution the 20th of July in our general meeting with translation in English, Spanish and Portuguese. We understood that the proposal had been known for a significant number of members of LACRALO on day 20th of July. Also, the proposal does not seem to be a complex motion that requires detailed analysis. Therefore, we used the exceptional power to vote on this motion without waiting the two weeks period.

In any case, we will put the motion for comments as you requested on the wiki.

Regards

El 29/07/2015 a las 11:56 a.m., Dev Anand Teelucksingh escribió:

I'm continue to be very disappointed at Alberto Soto and Humberto Carassco in the performance of their duties as chair and secretariat.

As per Rule 11.2 As a general rule, no draft resolution or amendment shall be discussed or put to the vote unless it has been circulated sufficiently in advance, but in no case less than two weeks, to all participants in the working languages of the Assembly.

THIS WAS NOT DONE.

Can be motion be put on the wiki for comment? I'll comment on the motion there, since there is an amendment I'll suggest.

Kind Regards,

Dev Anand

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:00 PM, ICANN At-Large Staff < staff@atlarge.icann.org> wrote:

...

== EN ==

Dear All,

Do you support Mr. Alejandro Pisanty’s motion? Formal Motion from Alejandro Pisanty:

a. LACRALO’s Chair and Secretariat shall do an Agenda with policy issues for discussion. b. The first 30 minutes of each monthly call shall be focused on debate of current ICANN public consultations.

* Yes * No * Abstain

== ES ==

Hola a todos,

¿Usted apoya la moción de Alejandro Pisanty?

a. que la Presidencia y la Secretaría hagan una agenda de temas de políticas para su discusión b. que los primeros 30' de cada sesión mensual se dediquen a temas sustantivos de debate de políticas en curso en consultas públicas de ICANN

*Si *No *Abstención

Regards,

Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing listlac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/09ac4d9701.html --]]