[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Examen Final - Miembro de la elección de ALAC (Parte 2) De: cintra.sooknanan@gmail.com Así que dejemos de patear a un lado a otro. José por este correo electrónico que considere su posición basada en la opinión personal de la ICANN y sobre la base de la división de opiniones ... solicitud de que usted y nuestra secretaria iniciar una votación sobre la inclusión o eliminación del candidato. Saludos Cintra Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry disponible desde bmobile. ----- Mensaje original ----- De: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> Remitente: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org Date: Fri, 17 de agosto 2012 08:29:39 Para: Webmaster <rok@bango.org.bb> Cc: <lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Examen Final - Miembro de ALAC Elecciones (Parte 2) República de Corea, Si sigo tu razonamiento, nadie tiene la responsabilidad de ver la retinopatía del prematuro es obedecido. Y en el caso de una violación, todo el mundo tiene el deber de sentarse en sus manos. No mi hermano, alguien debe hacer la llamada.Ese es un papel para el presidir oficial. Y si no está de acuerdo en la llamada, tenemos una manera de resolver ese desacuerdo. Convocatoria de una división y recuento de los votos. - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos * ============================= El Jue, 16 de agosto 2012 a las 11:09 PM, Webmaster <rok@bango.org.bb> escribió:

Carlton,

My understanding of a petition is that you have a grievance. Then you have to get a certain amount of members to agree to back the petition before it becomes valid. This depends on so many factors that for a chair to make a decision that requires members to petition should be a decision of a serious nature and not one so simplistic and obvious that does not even require a decision by the Chair. The Chair is sticking his neck out and I am not going to validate executive authority where it does not exist.

ROK

*From:* Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> *Sent:* Thursday, August 16, 2012 11:49 PM *To:* Webmaster <rok@bango.org.bb> *Cc:* Jacqueline Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> ; lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org *Subject:* Re: [lac-discuss-en] Final Consideration - Member of ALAC Election(Part 2)

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Webmaster <rok@bango.org.bb> wrote:

...

the Chair has a right to interpret rules carte blanche.

We do not accept our Chair as if he was the Bishop of Rome; infallible in all things.

As the presiding officer, the Chair's principal role is to interpret rules but not 'carte blanche'. He is constrained by the RoP in the first instance.

Here's the good thing. Every other member also has an unfettered right to interpret said rules.

And since for our purposes, the Chair is and must be a member in ordinary, every other member has the right to challenge any and every interpretation of the Chair.

Here's the kicker. Every member retains the absolute right to petition every other member to your point of view. We call that a vote.

I say again, if you fell aggrieved by the declaration, then there is a remedy. Exercise it if you must.

- CAS

============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================

No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5204 - Release Date: 08/16/12

[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/997b9dd904.html --]]