Estimado Alberto
Respecto el email de Rinalia , mi posición personal es la propuesta como esta es buena y aguardar para tener resultados del nuevo grupo a se formar por Competición, Escoja y Credibilidad para el Consumidor, por cierto va adicionar conocimiento sobre que demandas que ALAC debe cumplir para mejor atender la comunidad.
Dear Alberto,
Regarding Rinalia email below, my personal position is the proposed postponed document is good, and to wait for the results from "Competition, Consumer Choice & Consumer Trust Review” that certainly will add knowledge about all demands ALAC shall accomplish to better serve our community.
Abrazos / Best regards
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.
Dear ALAC & RALO Chairs,
I know that it is a busy time, but please do provide comments on whether the proposed slower pace of At-Large Review 2 is agreeable or if further adjustments are needed to ensure sufficient time and capacity for the At-Large community to do a meaningful review towards enhancing At-Large effectiveness and relevance.
Comments on other aspects of ICANN reviews as raised in the call for Public Comments would also be appreciated.
Best regards,
Rinalia
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)