- lac-discuss-es - lists.iana.org

? = UTF-8 q RECORDATORIO = 3A__Meeting_Invitation = = = 3A_LAC utf-8 q RALO_GSE_Capacity_Building_Webinar_ = E2 = 80 = 93_ICANN_ = = = 28Basic_Lev utf-8 q el = = 29_07_July_2015_at_23 3A00_UTC??????????? =
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org July 3, 2015

July 3, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto:? = UTF-8 q RECORDATORIO = 3A__Meeting_Invitation = = = 3A_LAC utf-8 q RALO_GSE_Capacity_Building_Webinar_ = E2 = 80 = 93_ICANN_ = = = 28Basic_Lev utf-8 q el = = 29_07_July_2015_at_23 3A00_UTC??????????? = Desde: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Queridos miembros de LACRALO, Como uno de los proyectos del Plan Estratégico ALC / LACRALO 2015, la cuarta Capacity Building Webinar titulado "ICANN y su estructura (Nivel Básico)" se celebrará el 07 de julio 2015 a las 23:00 UTC. Ponentes invitados: Albert Daniels - Gerente, grupos de interés, la ICANN Caribe y Carlos Aguirre, LACRALO. Orden del día 1. Moderador: Silvia Vivanco - Gerente, En Asuntos Regionales grandes 2. 3. Ecosistemas del DNS (Nivel Básico) 1. Historia 2. Hitos 3.Financiamiento 4. El modelo de múltiples partes interesadas 5. Los gobiernos y el GAC 6. ccNSO 7. gNSO 8. ASO 9. ALAC 10. SNCC 11. RSSAC 12. Junta de ICANN 13. zonas Personal 14. ¿Cómo participar 15. Preguntas y respuestas El proyecto de orden del día (para ser actualizado) y detalles de llamadas están disponibles en: https://community.icann.org/x/e6E0Aw Adigo ID de conferencia: ES: 1638 ES: 1738 PT: 5393 Adigo dial-en número: https://adigo.com/icann/ Adobe Connect (con audio bidireccional en español): http://icann.adobeconnect.com/lacralo Este webinar tendrá Inglés, interpretación en portugués y español. Si necesita una línea de salida por favor, póngase en contacto con At-Large personal staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> con su número preferido. Gracias. Saludos cordiales, De la ICANN VP Stakeholder Engagement- Latinoamérica anuncio el Caribe - Rodrigo de la Parra LACRALO Presidente, Alberto Soto y Secretaría, Humberto Carrasco Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine y Terri Agnew personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3ed268eeb4.html --]]

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Buscar en curso para el futuro CEO de ICANN
by vanda＠uol.com.br July 2, 2015

July 2, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Buscar en curso para el futuro CEO de ICANN Desde: vanda(a)uol.com.br Gracias Rinalia. Como ya expuse mis puntos de vista, voy a publicar en el wiki. Besos Vanda Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, CJ 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil Línea del terreno: +55 11 3266.6253 Móvil: + 55 11 98181.1464 Lo siento por los errores tipográficos. De: "lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> en nombre de Rinalia Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim(a)gmail.com> Fecha: Miércoles, 01 de julio 2015 a las 18:20 Para: "At-Large Worldwide ' <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> , 'APRALO' <apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> , <afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> , LACRALO lista <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> , "Lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> , Discusión Europa <euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> , "Na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] Búsqueda en curso para el futuro CEO de ICANN Estimado At-Large miembros de la comunidad, Estoy retransmitiendo un mensaje de George Sadowsky abajo con respecto a la ICANN CEO Buscar. Tenga en cuenta la fecha límite de 12 de julio de su entrada, que debe ser enviado por correo electrónico ceo-search-cmte-only(a)icann.org. La A t-Large wiki sobre el tema es aquí en caso de que quiera ver algunas ideas y discusión sobre el tema: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN+CEO+Selection+Criteria+201 5 + Espacio de trabajo Atentamente, Rinalia Abdul Rahim Miembro de la Junta CEO Comité de Búsqueda de la ICANN ---- Mensaje de George Sadowsky: > All, > > As you may know, Fadi ChehadÃ©, the CEO of ICANN, has announced his intent to > > ICANN has formed a search committee for the new CEO, of which I am the chair. ceo-search-cmte-only(a)icann.org, con el fin de recoger de observaciones sobre la búsqueda, las calificaciones de los candidatos, la descripción del trabajo, y el especial características de los mejores candidatos. Está abierto hasta el 12 de julio de 2015. Por favor, se sienten la libertad de contribuir con sus puntos de vista. Usted también debe tener ninguna duda en la difusión la palabra acerca de la búsqueda y sugieren fuertes candidatos para la consideración al las características específicas de trabajo disponibles. > > I'll get back to these lists about mid-July with an updated job description > > George Sadowsky lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b7e654877a.html --]]

1 0

Search underway for the future CEO of ICANN
by Rinalia Abdul Rahim July 2, 2015

July 2, 2015

Dear At-Large Community Members, I am relaying a message from George Sadowsky below regarding the ICANN CEO Search. Please note the deadline of 12 July for your input, which should be emailed to ceo-search-cmte-only(a)icann.org. The A t-Large wiki on the topic is here in case you want to see some ideas and discussion on the topic: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ICANN+CEO+Selection+Criteria+20… Best regards, Rinalia Abdul Rahim Member of the ICANN Board CEO Search Committee ---- Message from George Sadowsky: > All, > > As you may know, Fadi Chehadé, the CEO of ICANN, has announced his intent to leave the organization as of mid-March 2016. > > ICANN has formed a search committee for the new CEO, of which I am the chair. We've opened an e-mail address for interested parties, ceo-search-cmte-only(a)icann.org, in order to collect comments regarding the search, the qualifications of candidates, the job description, and the special characteristics of best applicants. It's open until July 12, 2015. Please feel free to contribute your views. You should also have no hesitation in spreading the word about the search and suggest strong candidates for consideration when the job specifics are available. > > I'll get back to these lists about mid-July with an updated job description and qualifications statement for the position. > > George Sadowsky

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by jam＠jacquelinemorris.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com Y mi aceptación de "principios generales", aunque "principios rectores" podría funcionar mejor. El 25 de junio 2015 13:15, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribió: > ..hence my deliberate use of the word 'baseline'. > > CAS > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jacqueline Morris < > jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> wrote: > >> The devil, is always, however, in the details. >> On 25 Jun 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. >>> >>> -Carlton >>> >>> >>> ============================== >>> Carlton A Samuels >>> Mobile: 876-818-1799 >>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* >>> ============================= >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >>>> >>>> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? >>>> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com >>>> >>>> Colleagues, >>>> >>>> >>>> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion >>>> on metrics. >>>> >>>> >>>> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, >>>> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This >>>> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not >>>> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. >>>> >>>> >>>> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us >>>> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be >>>> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute >>>> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer >>>> counted. And there >>>> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are >>>> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there >>>> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to >>>> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing >>>> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. >>>> >>>> >>>> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and >>>> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would >>>> rather obvious >>>> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and >>>> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip >>>> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that >>>> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or >>>> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles >>>> certifications, we must institute. >>>> >>>> >>>> There is a classification of units that can help us further >>>> in this process: >>>> >>>> >>>> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and >>>> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are >>>> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy >>>> ALAC and ICANN. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters >>>> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. >>>> >>>> >>>> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally >>>> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection >>>> processes >>>> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for >>>> travel. >>>> >>>> >>>> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations >>>> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who >>>> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. >>>> >>>> >>>> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group >>>> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good >>>> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and >>>> achievable. >>>> >>>> >>>> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? >>>> >>>> >>>> Alejandro Pisanty >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >>>> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >>>> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry >>>> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >>>> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >>>> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 >>>> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >>>> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >>>> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >>>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >>>> >>>> >>>> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3e50f79172.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by jam＠jacquelinemorris.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com El diablo, es siempre, sin embargo, en los detalles. El 25 de junio 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribió: > Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. > > -Carlton > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> >> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? >> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com >> >> Colleagues, >> >> >> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion >> on metrics. >> >> >> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, >> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This >> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not >> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. >> >> >> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us >> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be >> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute >> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer >> counted. And there >> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are >> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there >> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to >> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing >> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. >> >> >> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and >> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would >> rather obvious >> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and >> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip >> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that >> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or >> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles >> certifications, we must institute. >> >> >> There is a classification of units that can help us further >> in this process: >> >> >> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and >> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are >> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy >> ALAC and ICANN. >> >> >> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters >> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. >> >> >> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally >> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection >> processes >> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for >> travel. >> >> >> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations >> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who >> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. >> >> >> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group >> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good >> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and >> achievable. >> >> >> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? >> >> >> Alejandro Pisanty >> >> >> - >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry >> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> >> >> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ca7fb3bcbe.html --]]

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Estimado Alejandro, Apenas termine ICANN 53, nos pondremos con ESTO y Todo Lo Demás En que AÚN SE ESTA Trabajando. Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alejandro Pisanty Enviado el: jueves, 25 de junio de 2015 24:35 Para: LACRALO CC: lista de discusión de LACRALO Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Hola, creo Que Estamos en posicion de declarar ONU consensus Sobre Estós lineamientos Ayer Sergio y Otros me manifestaron verbalmente Apoyo a la Propuesta. Alberto y Humberto, de verdad de verdad les pido instituir El Proceso Correspondiente. Estafa Podemos Consenso Este: 1. EXPLORAR La Situacion reales de las Organizaciones pecado Iniciar Procesos Formales; 2. Cuales EXPLORAR Serian Las reglas Formales aplicables; 3. Ayudar Inmediato de una las Organizaciones que lo necesiten Más. Saludos cordiales Alejandro Pisanty El Jue, 25 de junio 2015 a las 11:42 AM, <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com <mailto:jam@jacquelinemorris.com> > Escribió: [[--Translated Texto (en -> es) -]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com <mailto:jam@jacquelinemorris.com> El diablo, es siempre, embargo de pecado, en los Detalles. El 25 de junio 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> > Escribio: > Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. > > -Carlton > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 <tel:876-818-1799> > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com <mailto:apisanty@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> >> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? >> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com <mailto:apisanty@gmail.com> >> >> Colleagues, >> >> >> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion >> on metrics. >> >> >> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, >> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This >> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not >> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. >> >> >> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us >> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be >> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute >> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer >> counted. And there >> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are >> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there >> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to >> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing >> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. >> >> >> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and >> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would >> rather obvious >> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and >> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip >> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that >> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or >> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles >> certifications, we must institute. >> >> >> There is a classification of units that can help us further >> in this process: >> >> >> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and >> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are >> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy >> ALAC and ICANN. >> >> >> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters >> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. >> >> >> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally >> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection >> processes >> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for >> travel. >> >> >> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations >> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who >> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. >> >> >> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group >> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good >> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and >> achievable. >> >> >> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? >> >> >> Alejandro Pisanty >> >> >> - >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry >> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> >> >> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/005ac6b985.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com ..hence mi uso deliberado de la palabra 'línea de base'. CAS ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planeación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega * ============================= El Jue, 25 de junio 2015 a las 9:41 AM, Jacqueline Morris <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > wrote: > The devil, is always, however, in the details. > On 25 Jun 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. >> >> -Carlton >> >> >> ============================== >> Carlton A Samuels >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* >> ============================= >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >>> >>> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? >>> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com >>> >>> Colleagues, >>> >>> >>> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion >>> on metrics. >>> >>> >>> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, >>> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This >>> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not >>> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. >>> >>> >>> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us >>> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be >>> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute >>> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer >>> counted. And there >>> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are >>> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there >>> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to >>> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing >>> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. >>> >>> >>> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and >>> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would >>> rather obvious >>> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and >>> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip >>> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that >>> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or >>> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles >>> certifications, we must institute. >>> >>> >>> There is a classification of units that can help us further >>> in this process: >>> >>> >>> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and >>> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are >>> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy >>> ALAC and ICANN. >>> >>> >>> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters >>> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. >>> >>> >>> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally >>> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection >>> processes >>> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for >>> travel. >>> >>> >>> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations >>> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who >>> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. >>> >>> >>> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group >>> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good >>> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and >>> achievable. >>> >>> >>> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? >>> >>> >>> Alejandro Pisanty >>> >>> >>> - >>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >>> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >>> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry >>> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >>> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >>> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 >>> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >>> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, >>> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >>> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >>> >>> >>> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/285d025814.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by apisanty＠gmail.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: apisanty(a)gmail.com Hola, creo Que Estamos en posicion de declarar ONU consensus Sobre Estós lineamientos Ayer Sergio y Otros me manifestaron verbalmente Apoyo a la Propuesta. Alberto y Humberto, de verdad de verdad les pido instituir El Proceso Correspondiente. Estafa Podemos Consenso Este: 1. EXPLORAR La Situacion reales de las Organizaciones pecado Iniciar Procesos Formales; 2. Cuales EXPLORAR Serian Las reglas Formales aplicables; 3. Ayudar Inmediato de una las Organizaciones que lo necesiten Más. Saludos cordiales Alejandro Pisanty El Jue, 25 de junio 2015 a las 11:42 AM, <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? > Desde: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > > El diablo, es siempre, sin embargo, en los detalles. > El 25 de junio 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" < > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribiÃ³: > > > > Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. > > > > -Carlton > > > > > > ============================== > > Carlton A Samuels > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > > ============================= > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > >> > >> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? > >> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com > >> > >> Colleagues, > >> > >> > >> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion > >> on metrics. > >> > >> > >> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, > >> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This > >> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not > >> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. > >> > >> > >> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us > >> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be > >> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute > >> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer > >> counted. And there > >> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are > >> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there > >> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to > >> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing > >> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. > >> > >> > >> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and > >> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would > >> rather obvious > >> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and > >> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip > >> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that > >> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or > >> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles > >> certifications, we must institute. > >> > >> > >> There is a classification of units that can help us further > >> in this process: > >> > >> > >> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and > >> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are > >> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy > >> ALAC and ICANN. > >> > >> > >> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters > >> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. > >> > >> > >> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally > >> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection > >> processes > >> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for > >> travel. > >> > >> > >> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations > >> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who > >> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. > >> > >> > >> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group > >> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good > >> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and > >> achievable. > >> > >> > >> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? > >> > >> > >> Alejandro Pisanty > >> > >> > >> - > >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > >> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry > >> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > >> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > >> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 > >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > >> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, > >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > >> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > >> > >> > >> > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/528d851f1c.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Sí, ahora estamos en el estadio de béisbol. Puedo apoyar estos para la línea de base. -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planeación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega * ============================= El Miércoles, 24 de junio 2015 a las 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? > From: apisanty(a)gmail.com > > Colleagues, > > > today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion > on metrics. > > > Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, > I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This > It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not > They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. > > > What we need we are accountability and transparency between us > thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be > identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute > They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer > counted. And there > an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are > difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there > Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to > spend time with family or work that sustains; changing > directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. > > > A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and > difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would > rather obvious > 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and > They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip > intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that > recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or > by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles > certifications, we must institute. > > > There is a classification of units that can help us further > in this process: > > > 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and > contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are > LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy > ALAC and ICANN. > > > 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters > Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. > > > 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally > leading to "make presence" for elections and selection processes > for participation in events, especially if they involve support for > travel. > > > Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations > should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who > make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. > > > If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group > Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good > implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and > achievable. > > > Is there any disagreement with these general principles? > > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > - > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > UNAM Faculty of Chemistry > 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f9777fd74b.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: ALAC vote sobre la propuesta GTC-Mayordom�a final
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Fwd: ALAC vote sobre la propuesta GTC-Mayordomía final Desde: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com Para su información, ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> Fecha: 25/06/2015 06:19 GMT-05: 00 Asunto: [ALAC] ALAC vote sobre la propuesta GTC-Mayordomía final Para: ALAC <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Me complace informar que el ALAC ha ratificado por unanimidad el Propuesta GTC-Mayordomía Final. El texto del informe se adjunta. Alan _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9bbc80b09e.html --]]

1 0