August 2012 - lac-discuss-es

Agregar su voz para CMTI 2012 Discusiones
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com Aug. 27, 2012

Aug. 27, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Agregar su voz para CMTI 2012 Discusiones De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com La UIT ha ofrecido una ventana. Yo le pido a añadir su voz a la discusiones. Lea la documentación de apoyo ofrecido antes de hacerlo. http://www.itu.int/en/wcit-12/Pages/public.aspx - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/23625bef75.html --]]

2 1

RESULTADO Y DETALLES VOTACION DELEGADO AL NOMCOM 2013
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org Aug. 27, 2012

Aug. 27, 2012

Estimados miembros de LACRALO: Como ya fue informado anteriormente, el resultado de la encuesta con la preferencia de la región para el delegado LACRALO al NomCom fue: * Jacqueline Morris 29.42 * Vanda Scartezini 32.77 * Abstasiones 0 * No Votaron 37.77 Vean en anexo quienes votaron y quien votó por quién. Sin más, Cordiales Saludos, Sylvia Herlein <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Secretaria LACRALO-ICANN/ 2012-2013 - <http://atlarge.icann.org> http://atlarge.icann.org Secretaria FLUI 2009-2012 sylvia_leite=Skype Descrição: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil

1 0

RES: [lac-discuss-en] Quorum on Virtual Votes - LACRALO Rules
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org Aug. 27, 2012

Aug. 27, 2012

Dear Carlton: Im so sorry it was my fault. But when we decided to extend the period because the Staff advised we dont have the minimum quorum, Ive only looked the Spanish version, and as you can see, is different from the English one. Regla 11 - Resoluciones y enmiendas 11.1 Los participantes pueden proponer resoluciones y enmiendas, apegándose a la Regla 1; éstas propuestas deben presentarse por escrito al Secretario de la Asamblea, quien distribuirá copias entre todos los participantes. 11.2 Como regla general, sólo se tratarán y se someterán a votación las resoluciones o enmiendas que se hayan distribuido con suficiente anticipación a todos los participantes de la Asamblea, en todos los idiomas con los que ésta trabaje. <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/2264378/AL%25202007%2520SD %25202%2520Rev2%2520LACRALO%2520Rules%2520of%2520Procedure%2520ES.pdf?versio n=1&modificationDate=1283972735000> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/2264378/AL%25202007%2520SD% 25202%2520Rev2%2520LACRALO%2520Rules%2520of%2520Procedure%2520ES.pdf?version =1&modificationDate=1283972735000 Rule 11 - Resolutions and Amendments 11.1 Draft resolutions and amendments may be proposed by the participants referred to in Rule 1 and shall be transmitted in writing to the Secretariat of the Assembly, which shall circulate copies to all participants. 11.2 As a general rule, no draft resolution or amendment shall be discussed or put to the vote unless it has been circulated sufficiently in advance to all participants in the working languages of the Assembly. 11.2 As a general rule, no draft resolution or amendment shall be discussed or put to the vote unless it has been circulated sufficiently in advance, but in no case less than two weeks, to all participants in the working languages of the Assembly. Should a vote in a virtual meeting not be quorate, then the chair shall extend the close of the vote for an equal amount of time as the original voting period. By the end of this extension, no quorum will be required. APPROVED https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/2264378/AL%25202007%2520SD% 25202%2520Rev2%2520LACRALO%2520Rules%2520of%2520Procedure%2520EN.pdf?version =1 <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/2264378/AL%25202007%2520SD %25202%2520Rev2%2520LACRALO%2520Rules%2520of%2520Procedure%2520EN.pdf?versio n=1&modificationDate=1283972736000> &modificationDate=1283972736000 We have a serious problem here. I hope the Translation WG could see this too. Warm regards and for notice that!! Sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Secretaria LACRALO-ICANN/ 2012-2013 - <http://atlarge.icann.org> http://atlarge.icann.org Secretaria FLUI 2009-2012 sylvia_leite=Skype Descrição: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- Dear Secretariat: I am compelled to bring to your attention actions and/or activities inconsistent with LACRALO Rules of Procedure, as adopted. Refer LACRALO RoP, Clause 11 and Clause 20, inclusive. Hereunder, the exact wording for Clause 11: "*Should a vote in a virtual meeting not be quorate, then the chair shall extend the close of the ** vote for an equal amount of time as the original voting period. By the end of this extension, **no quorum will be required.*" Note the word *chair* inline the rule. We must be assured that all actions are in keeping with the authorities vested in each officer, especially in light of recent concerns raised about the Chair exceeding authority. It is unclear to what extent the Chair of LACRALO was involved with this decision. Can you confirm that the Chair, LACRALO exercised his authority under the LACRALO RoP, declared his intention to you and requested that you communicate the decision to the rest of us? A quorum for a virtual vote presumes all ALS are present, even if not voting. The time period allocated for the original quorum was *22-Aug-2012 23:59 UTC to 25-Aug-2012 23:59 UTC.* That is to say three (3) days, inclusive. There could be other concerns as well. For example, I am studiously avoiding the English translation of the text from the Secretariat which says: *"**have not yet reached the minimum votes required and that is why we have extended the deadline for voting until *February Sunday 26 at 23:59 UTC.*"* Assuming it was the Chair's decision that you communicated, the record will show that your mail extended the quorum call *before* the expiration of the original call. That is an egregious violation of the rules. The action is more in line with the crystal ball gazing you see at a fairground; it pretends to construct and know the future before it has arrived. Secondly, the extension was for only one (1) additional day. This is also a plain violation since the rules would require an extension for three (3) days. Do be so advised. - Carlton Samuels The University of the West Indies ALS ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en -- Ab. Arce, Jose Francisco + 54 9 351 6788920

1 0

Fwd: [governance] Modern Global Standards Paradigm
by Carlos Vera Quintana Aug. 27, 2012

Aug. 27, 2012

Fyi Carlos VQ Enviado desde mi iPhone Inicio del mensaje reenviado: > De: JFC Morfin <jefsey(a)jefsey.com> > Fecha: 26 de agosto de 2012 20:14:00 GMT-05:00 > Para: governance(a)lists.igcaucus.org, > Asunto: [governance] Modern Global Standards Paradigm > Responder a: governance(a)lists.igcaucus.org,JFC Morfin <jefsey(a)jefsey.com> > > At 21:45 26/08/2012, IETF Chair wrote: >> The version with the phrase deleted is now available: >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-iesg-opsplenary-16.pdf > > The Internet is now commercial. And the IETF the first strategic opponent of the Civil Society. > > Great care should now be paid to the Patinum, Gold and Silver Member ISOC's affiliates IAB/IETF's positions as now revamped by this declaration. Previous RFCs on the matter (RFC 3869 and RFC 3935) said that network technology neutrality depended on Governments' funding of the Internet R&D and that the Internet technology was not to be the technology that's possible but the one that resonated with concepts and core values not mentionned any more and even probably opposed. > > This document refers to the *market*, *not* to the users *nor* to the people. > 8/26 the Internet 9/11. > > The IETF Chair indicates that they want to publish this document as an RFC. I personnally intend to appeal this publication and/or join any collective appeal that could be formed. My personnal position is to defend the IETF "edge-user empowerment" core value documented in RFC 3935, Statement of Mission for the IETF. > > > jfc > > > > >> On Aug 24, 2012, at 11:11 AM, IETF Chair wrote: >> >> > Thank you for the lively discussion. Based on the great number of messages, I judge that there is rough consensus for the IETF Chair and the IAB Chair signing the Affirmation. The Last Call asks for people to speak up if they have strong objections. Despite the phrasing of the question, many people spoke in favor of this action. >> > >> > A few people raised concerns about the process that lead to this document. First, Bernard Aboba, acting as IAB Chair, sent the statement out and asked for comment. Then, the document was discussed in the plenary session on Vancouver. Finally, on August 10th, I sent out the Last Call. Comments sent in reply to Bernard's message and comments from the plenary discussion were addresses prior to the Last Call. >> > >> > Here are the versions: >> > Asked for comment: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-iesg-opsplenary-4.pdf >> > Last Call: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-iesg-opsplenary-15.pdf >> > >> > This document is not intended for the standards track. The IAB is considering publication as an Informational RFC to preserve the document in the RFC series. >> > >> > Based on the comments received during the Last Call, one change is being made to the document. The document said: >> > >> > 4. Availability. Standards specifications are made accessible to all for >> > implementation and deployment. Affirming standards organizations have defined >> > procedures to develop specifications that can be implemented under fair terms. >> > Given market diversity, fair terms may vary from royalty-free (especially where >> > open source is commonplace) to fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms >> > (FRAND). >> > >> > The Last Call raised a concern, asking for deletion of this phrase: >> > >> > (especially where open source is commonplace) >> > >> > Based on the Last Call discussion, this change was recommended to the other signers. This change was accepted, and this phrase will be deleted. >> > >> > Thanks again, >> > Russ Housley >> > IETF Chair >> > >> > >> > On Aug 10, 2012, at 11:19 AM, IETF Chair wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> The IETF Chair and the IAB Chair intend to sign the Affirmation >> >> of the Modern Global Standards Paradigm, which can be found >> >> here: >> >> >> >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-iesg-opsplenary-15.pdf >> >> >> >> An earlier version was discussed in plenary, and the IAB Chair called >> >> for comments on the IETF mail list. This version includes changes >> >> that address those comments. >> >> >> >> Th IETF 84 Administrative plenary minutes have been posted, so that >> >> discussion can be reviewed if desired. The minutes are here: >> >> >> >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/minutes/minutes-84-iesg-opsplenary >> >> >> >> On 8 August 2012, the IEEE Standards Association Board of Governors >> >> approved this version of the document. The approval process is >> >> underway at the W3C as well. >> >> >> >> The IETF Chair and the IAB Chair intend to sign the Affirmation in the >> >> next few weeks. Please send strong objections to the iab(a)iab.org >> >> and the ietf(a)ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-08-24. >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> Russ Housley >> >> IETF Chair >> > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > You received this message as a subscriber on the list: > governance(a)lists.igcaucus.org > To be removed from the list, visit: > http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing > > For all other list information and functions, see: > http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see: > http://www.igcaucus.org/ > > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

1 0

Qu�rum de Votos Virtuales - Reglas LACRALO
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com Aug. 26, 2012

Aug. 26, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Quórum de Votos Virtuales - Reglas LACRALO De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Querido Secretaría: Me veo obligado a señalar a la atención de sus acciones y / o actividades incompatibles con las Reglas de Procedimiento LACRALO, aprobado. Consulte LACRALO Reglas de Procedimiento, la Cláusula 11 y la Cláusula 20, ambos inclusive. A continuación, las palabras exactas para Cláusula 11: "* En caso de no proceder a votación en una reunión virtual válidamente constituida, entonces el Presidente se extender el cierre de la ** votar por una cantidad igual de tiempo que el período de votación original. A finales de esta extensión, ** No se requerirá quórum. * "Observe la palabra * Comedor * inline la regla. Debemos estar seguros de que todas las acciones están en consonancia con las autoridades conferido a cada funcionario, especialmente a la luz de las recientes preocupaciones planteadas acerca de el Presidente excede de las facultades. No está claro hasta qué punto el Presidente del LACRALO participó en esta decisión.¿Puede confirmar que el Presidente, LACRALO ejerció su autoridad bajo el ROP LACRALO, declaró su intención de usted y solicita que se comunique la decisión al resto de nosotros? El quórum para la votación virtual, supone todo ALS están presentes, aunque no votación. El período de tiempo asignado para el quórum original * 22-Ago-2012 23:59 UTC al 25-ago-2012 23:59 UTC. * Es decir, tres (3) días, inclusive. Podría haber otras preocupaciones. Por ejemplo, yo soy evitando escrupulosamente la traducción en Inglés del texto de la Secretaría, que dice: * "** no han alcanzado los votos mÃnimos requeridos y es por eso que hemos ampliado el plazo para la votaciÃ³n hasta febrero * Domingo 26 a las 23:59 UTC. * "* Suponiendo que fue la decisiÃ³n del Presidente de que usted comunicÃ³, el registro demostrar que su correo ampliÃ³ la convocatoria quÃ³rum * antes * de que expire el llamada original. Esa es una violaciÃ³n flagrante de las reglas. La acciÃ³n es mÃ¡s en lÃnea con la bola de cristal que se ve en un parque de atracciones, sino que pretende construir y conocer el futuro antes de que haya llegado. En segundo lugar, la extensiÃ³n era de sÃ³lo un (1) dÃa adicional. Esto es tambiÃ©n una clara violaciÃ³n ya que las reglas requerirÃa una extensiÃ³n de tres (3) dÃa. Seas tan recomendable. - Carlton Samuels La Universidad de las Indias Occidentales ALS ============================== Carlton Samuels A MÃ³vil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, PlanificaciÃ³n, Gobierno, EvaluaciÃ³n y Turnaround * ============================= _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/95754609ef.html --]]

1 0

Gobierno de tomar el control de su router dom�stico en crisis?
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com Aug. 26, 2012

Aug. 26, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Gobierno de tomar el control de su router doméstico en crisis? De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Ahora, esta es una idea cuyo tiempo está por venir! - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6f506c6847.html --]]

1 0

Evoluci�n de Privacidad de Datos - Australia
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com Aug. 26, 2012

Aug. 26, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Evolución de Privacidad de Datos - Australia De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Australia ha revisado sus leyes de privacidad de datos ... "* Los cambios permiten a la policía para obligar a las empresas de telecomunicaciones a retener datos sobre personas de interés por un período determinado mientras que una orden es sough ** t *. "La última parte de la cita es mi énfasis. Esta ley cumple con las obligaciones del tratado para la Unión Europea y está en consonancia con la UE Directiva sobre conservación de datos de 2006. Vea la historia aquí y de nuevo en la Ley sí desde allí. Lea los comentarios también. http://mobile.itnews.com.au/Article.aspx?CIID=312771&type=News Por supuesto, no todos están contentos con este desarrollo, la comparación de la requisitos desfavorablemente en contra de la Directiva sobre conservación de datos de la UE de 2006, alrededor de la cual las obligaciones convencionales se centran. Si usted no está familiarizado con esta Directiva, lea la advertencia plena de la UE Directiva sobre conservación de datos de 2006 aquí y prestar mucha atención a los artículos 2 -6, Inclusive: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:105:0054:00… Todavía estoy tratando de averiguar más datos e información que te llegan a través de aplicación de los artículos 10 y 14; Estadística y Evaluación. - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3a9f440c4a.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: ICANN News Alert - Informe del SSAC sobre dominios sin punto
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com Aug. 26, 2012

Aug. 26, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Fwd: ICANN News Alert - Informe del SSAC sobre dominios sin punto De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com FYI. Implicaciones importantes para los usuarios de este documento, especialmente con respecto al uso de aplicaciones, navegadores más que cualquier otra índole, así como la forma del dispositivo es configurado para el acceso a Internet. - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= ** [Imagen: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> Alerta de noticias http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-24aug12-en.htm ------------------------------ SSAC Informe sobre dominios sin punto 24 de agosto 2012 * Anuncio de Foro: Período Comentario * Abre en * Fecha: * 24 de agosto 2012 * Categorías / Etiquetas: * - Dominios de nivel superior - Seguridad / Estabilidad * Propósito (Breve): * El propósito de este período de comentarios públicos es acercar a la atención del informe del SSAC sobre sin punto dominio <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/ssac/documents/sac-053-en.pdf> y para solicitar su opinión sobre la aplicación de la ICANN de las recomendaciones en este informe. * Enlace Comentario Público caja: * http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/sac053-dotless-domains-24aug12-… _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ea3f12e42a.html --]]

2 1

Lengua Plataforma Republicana de incluir " libertad en Internet"
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com Aug. 26, 2012

Aug. 26, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Lengua Plataforma Republicana de incluir "libertad en Internet" De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Um, bueno, es la mente racional que elige no subestimar la Política norteamericana. Fwiw, la mayoría de los analistas creen que si el contenido sigue la línea de los llamados marco político "Rand Paul, significaría un mayor control ISP y el dominio de su punto de vista sobre la "neutralidad neta". - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7a7e498060.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? EXTENCION_PLAZO_VOTACI = D3N? =
by jam＠jacquelinemorris.com Aug. 25, 2012

Aug. 25, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? EXTENCION_PLAZO_VOTACI = D3N? = De: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com 26 de febrero? Esa es una extensión muy larga .... Jacqueline A. Morris La tecnología debería ser como el oxígeno: ubicua, necesaria, Invisible y Gratis. (Después de que Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) El Viernes, 24 de agosto 2012 a las 6:39 PM, <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? EXTENCION_PLAZO_VOTACI = D3N? = > From: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org > > Dear members of LACRALO: > > > As you all know we are with 2 processes in open votacin: > > > RULE 8 > > > ALS 158 and 159 s > > > We have not reached the minimum of votes needed and that is why we > extended the deadline for voting until Sunday February 26 at 23:59 UTC. > > > Please note that when two different processes, the staff has sent one > voting card for each of them. > > > Verifying if the received and otherwise come into contact with > Matt Ashtiani (matt.ashtiani @ icann.org) > > > If you have any questions, please come to contact. > > > Greetings all, > > > Sylvia > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________ > > > Sylvia Herlein > > > <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org > > > Secretary LACRALO-ICANN / 2012-2013 - <http://atlarge.icann.org> > http://atlarge.icann.org > > > 2009-2012 Secretary FLUI > > > sylvia_leite = Skype > > > Descrio: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e903368085.html --]]

1 0